Phone Texting: (727) 834-0438
2803 Troy Road
Springfield Ohio 45504
PLEASE NOTE! This is a Rough Draft commenced on 11/11/21
This time it's Manta. When things get too hot they will invariably just change their name and continue "business" as usual, just like we've seen all-too many times with the privileged business class throughout the years (e.g. Time Warner, a.k.a. Spectrum, a.k.a. Road Runner, a.k.a. Charter Communications, ad naueseaum).
The following Draft is the basis for my assessment that Manta is purposefully and knowingly (because I keep letting them know) causing unprovoked harm to another. Their multiple conflicting listings gives their company more Internet exposure resulting in harm to those that are listed by manta (the harm being search engine rankings are manipulated with all the manta conflicting listings of the same entity they are showcasing).
Racketeering is a criminal activity in which a person or organization engages in a “racket.” A racket is when the criminal creates a problem for others for the purpose of solving that problem by some type of extortion. The person or organization who engages in the racket is called a racketeer.
If I propagate multiple listings with conflicting or misinformation about a business, would I not be dragged through their courts and labeled as criminal?
How is it that Manta has not been dragged down brick-by-brick for the crime of defamation, or worse?
Truth be told, I was not expecting so many people to be saying the same things on so many sites (try going to google and typing in Manta scam and see for yourself....hundreds upon hundreds of 1 star reviews await thee).
In fact, it's my opinion that If the court system were not equally able to edit their bad google reviews so blatantly, they might be the only entities to one-up Manta in absurdity and posing a dis-service to the community.
Manta appears to be conducting a hit-and-run tactic. Manta publishes data that is incorrect information forcing the victim to contact Manta to repair the misinformation.
And although Manta suckered me into signing up for their over-capitalizing "service" racket stating I could sign in to correct the erroneous information myself. It was a lie.
Today's Date is Thursday, 25-Dec-2025 21:11:23 EST
2014-2025 Kenny Hendrick and the Public Diary. All Rights Reserved.
Posted for educative purposes under THE FAIR USE NOTICE: These Videos may contain copyrighted (© ) material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Such material is made available to advance understanding of ecological, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, moral, ethical, and social justice issues, etc. It is believed that this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, this material is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior general interest in receiving similar information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode
"Copyright Disclaimer Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for "fair use" for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use." Disclaimer: 17 Notwithstanding the Provisions of Sections 17 U.S.C. @ 106 and 17 U.S.C. @ 106A, the Fair Use of a Copyrighted work for Educational Purposes- Not For Profit- Non-Commercial. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/legalcode