Ohio Terror in Springfield Page 2

Page 2

Resumed from Page 1

I hadn't any reason to doubt Nicole as being a Crow since there was also a twitter account and one other account online that showed her as a Crow. Although the accounts appear to have been deleted from the internet as of this writing, I luckily incorporated her twitter account in a screenshot in one of my videos...so nobody has to take my word for it.

Twitter is an embedded entity just like all monopoly sites on the net these days, so it's easy to ascertain as to whether or not there had ever been a Nicole "crow"

Recently I learned that Nicole has another last name....at least that is what the courts in Springfield have on her when the crows obtained their first almost $5,000.00 default judgment against Nicole Crow, the upstair neighbor.

I was already moved out for many months but about a month or so after that suit was "won" against the upstairs neighbor, I received a notice in the mail that the Crows were suing me for damages to their property, too!

Then about a month later after I taunted their threats with, "I'm ready to show and tell at court", my mother received a notice that the landlord and court was suing the previous lease holder, my mother instead of me.

I'm well-over 50-years of age if anybody is wondering (not a minor).

My mother held the previous one-year lease with Theresa Crow. Theresa Crow's signature and my mother's are the only signatures on the lease Agreement between my mother and Theresa Crow. Yet oddly enough the Court would eventually "award" Eric Crow instead of Theresa Crow the winnings (another almost $5,000.00).

I was present during the signing of my mother's lease. The agreement was concluded inside the Crow's rental in the year 2012 and my mother's one-year lease was concluded in 2013; whereas my lease agreement was with Eric Crow for the subsequent year and it was concluded in 2014.

Eric Crow is the husband of Theresa Crow and the subsequent lease between Eric Crow and I would include caveats not contained in my mother's lease.

One of the most obvious differences is that my mother's lease was a monthly lease, whereas mine would be a quarterly rental fee.

The sick part of the story is the fact that the courts would rule against my 70+ year old mother without a shred of substantiation whatsoever. Eric Crow would receive the booty from both the upstairs tenant in a default judgment, and later the swindling of my mother for about the same amount.

Again, Eric Crow hadn't any agreement with whatsoever with my mother (ever).

Judge Trempe went along with the wrongful suit (and after coaxing my mother and I by instructing us to file a counter-suit, taking our money for a counter-suit, that too would be denied without a refund or any explanation as to why it would be denied (of course the apparent crooked court kept the money).

Long after I gave notice to vacate the Crow premises, due mostly to the damaging effects of the rental's faulty electrical, and long after I had vacated the Crow Property, came a new letter to my new residence, stating that I was being sued for damages to the Crow Property.

This threw me off and what I was reading was totally unexpected. At the very time I gave my notice to vacate, Eric Crow and I performed the customary "walk-through" inspection, not one but two separate occasions. Eric had one solitary contention pertaining to a hole that was in one of the walls which he expressed I ought to repair. Before I left the Crow property I had called Eric but he wasn't present and instead I spoke to one of his daughters. I inquired if the Crows would like me to pull up the damaged carpets and place them at the curb to which the daughter replied, "No, we have people to do that". As is my style I pressed further, "Are you sure, I don't mind doing it?". If I recall correctly this call came before the second walk-through in which the photographer daughter, Sarah Crow, myself and both Eric and Theresa Crow partook in the final inspection prior to my moving out (I believe it was performed a day or two prior to my vacating).

However it was following the initial walk-through inspection when came a series of disasters.

The Clark County Municipal Court would go on to state that I am not a party and "have no standing in the Landlord-Tenant Suit.

Question: Can anyone on the planet alter contracts and agreements in which they are not named? If so, we'd all be in a precarious situation. I not only had standing, but was stomping out the motions to prove the case is a fraud during the many months in which the cherade continued against my mother in Florida who had nothing to do with the damages or the rental, yet the court was spewing foulness that I "had no standing". If that were true, then explain how I was able to give notice to vacate on my mother's previous lease agreement?

Fact is, the Clark County Municipal Court performed blatant fraud (and that's not just my opinion as it can easily be seen using nothing more than a computer and reviewing the 18 motions I and my mother submitted).

Then, on the very day of my physically vacating, Eric, his wife Theresa, and the photographer daughter approached me for the final "walk-through" inspection where I was happy to show them all the hole had been properly repaired.

However the larger shock was their changing mode to threaten my mother instead of me later. My mother had replied from Florida to their threat of suit sending certified letters to each of the parties in the case (the Crows and the Crow Attorney had to both physically sign for their respective letters from my mom).

During that time, my mother obtained a paid attorney, James Heath.

I knew something was shady but couldn't put my finger on it, then I saw the name of someone that signed for the letter to the Crows.

The name was none other than the Champaigne County Sheriff.

This new revelation shocked me so I investigated the matter further and found that the Sheriff had married one of the Crow Daughters!

I decided to find out more about the sheriff that signed for the legal mail to the Crows and found that his father was down in florida (I don't remember if he is dead or alive at the time of this writing). I found also that a woman up here had left him a parcel of property with a decent home on it, and that she had died. There wasn't much more investigation made on this matter as I stopped when I found that he married one of the Crows (small world just got smaller).

The Sheriff's name is on the green signature verification card so he would have been present at the Crow's main property in Urbana Ohio when the mail was delivered in Champaigne County.

A copy of the signed mail addressed to the Crows is contained on my legal website and the Clark County Court Record Website.

One can also find the very document I speak of on the Clark County Municipal Court's online Court Record (peruse through the 18 motions I and my mom submitted to the Court Record.

My mom's paid attorney quit shortly after I left voice mail informing both attorneys that I have videos that refute the claim that the Crows had made against my mother. I told them both that the first damages that occurred at the Crow Property were due to the Sheriff and the Crow's upstairs altercation. I made it more than clear that I hadn't caused any damages that were not already addressed. This is a good spot to include a video showing some of the un-requested repairs I made to the Crow Property.

So the farce of a justus system. went on to railroad my mom leaving her unassisted and un-represented and assessed her capable of damaging ceiling tiles and staining carpets at the ripe old age of 70+ ALL THE WAY FROM FLORIDA.

p.s. I'd be interested in seeing the DNA Test on the child that Nicole Crow had (just curious about how that might all turn out).

Note: I am willing to take a lie detector test that what I have stated actually happened.

Since then all sorts of repercussions have come from this ordeal.

1.) Here is a video / audio recording: Video Bizarro

2.) Threats of criminal proceedings If I did not comply with orders that contradicted the compliance documents which are in place for the township in which I reside.

3.) Threats of $100.00 per day forfeiture if I failed to change the color of the lights INSIDE the home.

4.) Destruction of property in a State Drive-by (twice, I still have the remains in the second garage) seen here:Video

5.) Here is a website that documents the Crow Claim

Finding our nation to be more and more oppressive and having little incentive to remain (for instance, why don't our offspring own the mini-marts, motels, convenience stores, etc.? The bible speaks in Revelations of a whore (the entity that sells herself and contrasts it to a faction in the end times that sells out an entire nation "and runs off to the desert place". The bible states that "when ye see these signs, my people come out of her"

So I decided to leave the lawlessness behind but then I'm denied to leave the Country: Video

EVERYTHING in this testimony is truth, and nothing but the truth to the best of my abilities....

This information of a county officer having caused the first appearance of damages at the property located 1335 North Limestone St. was communicated PRIOR TO PRE-TRIAL to both attorneys of a Case Number: 15CVF02981 One might notice a few anomalies:

1.) Following the given information, my mom's attorney quit the case (at Pre-Trial).

2.) The municipal court denied my becoming a party to a case in which I AM THE only obvious PARTY to the Issue of the very Case being heard in their court.

3.) That, upon appealing the decision to the higher Appellate Court in regard to the denial by the lower court to allow me the ability to be a party to the case since I WAS the party to the ISSUE.

Instead, months after I had filed the appeal to the 2nd Appellate money-pit, the lower municipal court pushed right on through to Trial (without waiting for the higher court's decision in the matter as to whether I have the right to represent myself to the issue).

4.) That the lower court appeared just fine with leaving an elderly defendant completely un-represented or un-assisted in a court room during a final determination, that being TRIAL.

5.) Since I was demoted to that of a witness to the case (a witness cannot of his or her own accord produce evidence and can only reply to questions from the other parties) and since my elderly mother was the Defendant unproficient in the use of the nomenclature used by the court system., I was surprised when one logical critical question finally came from her:

"Do you have evidence to show that I did not cause the damages and anything to show the state of the property in which you vacated?". Of course my answer was, "Yes"

And as I stated and pointed to a suitcase in the rear of the court room, stating, "Everything including the video evidence is right there in the briefcase", the "judge" wasn't interested in the least (my point is, if he's not standing for right, then he's standing for wrong; if not for good, then he is bad and a waste).

Then the Crows produced a fake bill from a fake company. I can say that because if you search records for TEC Rentals, you'll not find a license of any such business (so shady is as shady does). I can also state that the bill is fraudulent, take a look at the date on it. My mom's lease was still in effect!!!! BUT I DID NOT MOVE OUT UNTIL 2014 (which is when the police, the firemen, the codes department, all of my customers, and even the neighbors were made aware of the damages as they were occuring (not to mention I made videos whenever something out of the ordinary happened there).

So 7 months after I vacated came the letters threatening first me, then my mother for damages that Eric Crow was pretending to be a repairman.

But back to the "trial"...

The judge did not want to see the evidence and did his best to quiet me for the MINUTES I was permitted into the Court Room.

Anyone can get the Trial transcripts to test whether my words be so. One might presume I was up on that stage for quite some time, I wasn't. It was in the manner of minutes before I was sequestered back out of the court room to the hall.

((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((

But Poor Nicole Crow!

I learned over the phone from a young man that there was a different Sheriff, named "Joey", a Clark County Sheriff, and that "Joey" had relations with Nicole for awhile also.

I wanted to be sure that the correct Sheriff was in question, so upon Calling the Clark County Police Department, I initially spoke with the under-Sheriff, who when asked if there was a Joey in his employ, first required of me the reason I was making inquiry and also required my full name.

After giving him the information he was insisting on (for whatever reason), he then stated there was not a Joey in the Department.

A few words between us and I was about to conclude our conversation thinking it was a bad tip,

but rephrased the question,

"So, no Joe, Joey, Joseph?"

To which time he stated,

"Now we have a Joe here"

So there is a Joe (just not a joe y).

Pressing further, I was then passed over to "Gaye", she's identified herself as the Liaison to the Clark County Court of Springfield Ohio. I had the distinct impression that something was very wrong due to her demeanor. If I find time to locate the audio recording, I'll paste it here.

And then finally I was passed on to Ben, who was very helpful, stating that I could come to the Police Department and be permitted to see the photos of officers there. (This is just a hunch and I'm not exactly a gambling man, but my hunch is that this Joey / Joe has been relegated to a desk position for reprimand already).

So until I see a picture of this "Joey", this page is on hold for the sake of certainty, and am XXX'ing out the names of the following Sheriff until further notice. I am certain of one thing though, the upstairs Crow stated it was a Champaigne County Sheriff and not a Clark County Sheriff, as I already related on this page or the first page.

Within the very easily verifiable lies of the Court's JustUs System, are the mere notion of facts that can be all too easily refuted. For instance, in the Court's Judgment:

fabrications are seen.

For instance, the "judgement" states that "..the Defendant-lessee surrendered possession of the leased premises in August 2014..", I wonder where the judge obtained that non-fact from.

My mother has credit card receipts and plenty of persons that can place her over 700 miles away and her telephone receipts will show zero communications with the Crows between the end of her lease and the end of my lease.

My mother physically could not vacate the premises in 2014.

And furthermore, the judgement is off by a month. I vacated in September -i wrote it on the furnace but have to wait for a decent hour to go in and reference that note, 2014 (anyway it was not August 2014 as the "judge" dreamed up).

It is January 12, 2019 and the Clark County Municipal Court of Springfield Ohio still persists with not so much as an apology. Instead they antagonize by sending a bill for services. This bill came along with a lie-letter, stating they've already sent numerous notices to me. I'll eat undershorts if the "good" court could produce one shred of evidence that they've ever sent any other notice whatsoever. This bill they are flaunting is despite the fact that the Court had already found correctly that I'm indigent and legally allowed to commence a filing of motions. One cannot file anything without either paying money to them, or a finding of indigence. Only if the Court first makes such a finding of indigency, could I possibly have filed without money. And since no money has been thus far allocated to the Court, it's probably safe to assume that if the English of their Laws have any validity at all, then I've the right to file without cost. Either way though, the Clark County Court Letter shows a bunch of liars and cheats when they make the statement that they've sent previous notices and that the letter that was received is stamped "final notice". What type of people ...

And finally, although I fully responded to their solitary claim of some indebtedness, upon my written reply the Court hadn't even the common decency to respond back.

I've posted both correspondences somewhere else on this website and will come back to add links when time permits.

Disclaimer.

Due to my aging (outrageously fast in my opinion) I will include herein this disclaimer that I am willing to take a lie detector test or undergo any questioning as pertaining to details of this online Public Journal, namely the Nicole Pages. Since I've only seen the guy one time it is by my best judgment to try and omit his name due to predatorial waters within the justus system. who apparently haven't a shred of decency left (in my opinion). The laws and rights we are indoctrinated to believe, appear variable at best (in my opinion).

Letter of some importance showing who and when the crow letter was signed:

Here's a photo of the handywork of the landlord (eric crow) of my lease:

I'm not a party to the case but the profiteers felt A-ok to send me this bill for their "services".