The Clark County Municipal Court Found my mother guilty of making a fire in the fireplace.
There's just a few dozen problems with that judicial determination, I'll mention only one on this page.
The Plaintiffs, Eric and Theresa Crow have claimed smoke damage.
Furthermore, the Plaintiffs actually claim just the opposite, stating that the fireplace was(is) working just fine.
Apparently the landlord's claim shown below is variable.
And yet the Judge didn't want this evidence in "his" courtroom.
So I'm attaching the evidence here.
But in a biased Court the innocent are preyed upon. Notice also on the affidavit made by Theresa and Eric Crow that there are/were problems with the Central Heating and Air (which is why we started a fire in the fireplace in the first place!). Ohio gets cold in the winter-time.
Not to mention that the "smoke damage" was painted over by me with my own paint. The whole argument for smoke damage was never brought up during the walk-through inspection following my informing to Eric Crow that I was vacating. Again, the ONLY issue Eric Crow had was with the square hole seen in the video that shows I repaired it properly.
The Clark County Municipal Court of Springfield Ohio's Judge Trempe did not allow Any of the evidences, nor a first-person party to be permitted to present videos that show the claim is a hoax.
Keeping this and other evidence out of the case, thereby finding a 70+ year old innocent Florida woman guilty of damages to the Ohio property, Sound incredible.
For Information concerning this issue, contact Kenny Hendrick
2803 Troy Road Springfield Ohio
Read about Case Number 15CVF02981
Topic Two: Old lady found guilty of being "the cause" of damage to ceiling tiles and carpet.
The Clark County Municipal Court's Judge Trempe also denied evidence, videos that show water coming from the upstairs tenant causing ceiling tiles and water damage to the tenant space below.
Do you see my mom in this video? Since when is it to be construed as "justice" to find the downstairs tenant liable for the actions of EITHER the upstairs tenant's negligence or the crappy plumbing/electrical installations of the landlord.
The Courts found my mother guilty of damages to ceiling tiles (4) and carpet (the entire single style/type carpet) totalling $4k+. Apparently the Judge, using his best expensive judgment, thought it right to replace the entire carpet for the few stains located mainly in two rooms (caused by the floods, the landlord and his workmen, the firemen, and others that had to trek through the rented space to get down to the utilities basement). One thing is certain though, my mom did NOT "cause" the damages.
If your device doesn't play the video, try this .mp4 version instead (or just right-click and download the video to your own computer for the smoothest play).
Why would the Clark County Municipal Court not allow video evidence?
To show our videos are authentically made, here is the Plaintiffs' realtor which uploaded his video to Youtube long before I or my mother leased from Eric or Theresa Crow's Property.
3-years before I or my mother leased with Eric Crow or Theresa Crow, check out the carpet: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eD3cgH3jhxgThe videos are the same property, 1335 North Limestone Street in Springfield Ohio.
Topic Three:The Claim against Margaret Baldino
My mother could NOT have been the "Cause" for damages. Not only was she in Florida at the time of the damages, but can also show that she had become domiciled in Florida almost two years prior to the suit having been filed in the Clark County Municipal Court of Springfield Ohio..
Judge Trempe did not allow any evidence, nor a first-person party to become a Party to the claim which was filed by the Crows, keeping these and other evidences out of the case, thereby finding a 70+ year old Florida woman guilty of damages to the Ohio property.
Sound incredible?
There's more evidences that were flatly denied in the Clark County Court, buy why.
Videos
Photos and videos that show the actual time-frame and the actual live flooding.
Signed Documents prior to the suit having been file.
Witnesses
Signature-verified correspondence during the proceeding.
The actual CORRECT party to the issu.
The actual CORRECT lease to the issue and more.
Does it sound like a legitimate court that would deny so many evidences.
If your device doesn't play the video, try this .mp4 version instead (or just right-click and download the video to your own computer for the smoothest play).
Case Number: 15CVF02981
Today's Date is Tuesday, 16-Dec-2025 19:51:32 EST
2014-2025 Kenny Hendrick and the Public Diary. All Rights Reserved.
Posted for educative purposes under THE FAIR USE NOTICE: These Videos may contain copyrighted (© ) material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Such material is made available to advance understanding of ecological, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, moral, ethical, and social justice issues, etc. It is believed that this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, this material is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior general interest in receiving similar information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode
"Copyright Disclaimer Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for "fair use" for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use." Disclaimer: 17 Notwithstanding the Provisions of Sections 17 U.S.C. @ 106 and 17 U.S.C. @ 106A, the Fair Use of a Copyrighted work for Educational Purposes- Not For Profit- Non-Commercial. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/legalcode